Edited by Luciano Caramel
Milan, Palazzo Reale 10 March to 24 June 2007
Catalog Edizioni Gabriele Mazzotta
Just yesterday, as I wrote above, I visited the exhibition Kandinsky at the Royal Palace. How many things did not know this artist!
Few were my memories of high school and many prejudices sull'astrattismo related to ignorance on the subject. In my mind the works of this artist mingled with each other, becoming an 'immense and unique composition of color stains and peculiar without precise connotation. Pointing towards the truth, with the help of a guide as prepared as attractive (Fausto), you understand how each work is a separate and expressive in its uniqueness: nothing is equal to something else and the artist is never equal to himself ... always changing his inspirations are determined by cultural events and private lives, so their creations are an expression of an interior that varies with the circumstances.
The aspect that I found most interesting is the relationship of artistic order established by k. with his contemporaries, by members of the Bauhaus to composers of classical music, and the artist's ability to manage heterogeneous sources transforming them into works of art by the great expressive value. This support
be the merit of K.: to be an expression of his age, with the media and cultural influences inherent in the 'time away from academics ... and things you've seen before!
Someone could turn the criticism following some 'controversy, "great merit or consolation? I myself have questioned in recent terms. Everything seems to be regarded as art today, then it seems obvious to attribute the term "beautiful" to works that actually are. Other times you find yourself in a situation of embarrassment at having to mention something that is just as beautiful work of art. "
What is the solution of the riddle? K. has created works of art or simply has mixed colors, they were combined so well with the combination of wallpaper and the sofa?
The abstract can not please everyone, as his contemporaries did not like ....
I think the reflection stops at the first encounter with a painting chosen at random from those made by a contemporary painter which is depopulated in Rome and has earned a wall in the lobby of the Hilton in Milan, Mr. Butera.
Neophytes art during my journey I learned something that I feel I must share with you: Do not ever considered a work of art is aesthetically beautiful, but it is absolutely beautiful in itself 'and if he can convey envi message, then the artist has expressed to you in a real epiphany. And the work has reason to be called "Art".
I leave open the discussion ...
conclude by inviting all those who still have not gone to visit the exhibition ... of course asking for a vision guided by Fausto ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment