For years I believed unquestionably that the structural-functionalist anthropologist had the arm of British colonialism, a kind of know your enemy ... And a little 'is true, even though they were driven by the thirst of study, as well as outright by thirst and hunger in some cases ... ... how beautiful the dots ... say a lot ... The Mom bought at the market ... of flour. Fantastic. Then comes one day lecture and Professor of Anthropology politics (the most original and imaginative science of all) tells us about the anarchist Alfred. Why did Radcliffe-Brown is less interested in scoietà headless, of STRUCTURES, functions? The answer that leaves half the audience open-mouthed is: why the university named Alfred anarchy. This statement leaves me ... dazed: Companies operating without a headless king and government, there is order (keyword for the British school) in a society without leaders, what prevents us from recreating in England?! In the face of the establishment. And I thought that the revolutionaries were those of the school in Manchester. And some people thought that those of the school in Manchester is so called because cheering Manchester. We no longer know what we are going on this tera.
... of confusion
Philostratus, one that should be a degree.
0 comments:
Post a Comment